How To Be a Good Friend on Social Media Part 2 (or 2)
So if the first part of this series was about things you can do, these recommendations can best be understood as caveats and considerations about how you use social media with friends.
However, that's where I deviate from my advice. My approach (and I have lost Facebook connections because of this mind you and am ok with that) is that I'm likely to speak up on a person's wall when I find something offensive or factually inaccurate. I do this because I'm personally a firm believer of dialogue. When I find something that is offensive or disagreeable, I move into the conversation, not by attacking the other person (usually) but by critically considering what has been posted and commenting as such. It's something I do regularly.
Did you enjoy this read? Let me know your thoughts down below or feel free to browse around and check out some of my other posts!. You might also want to keep up to date with my blog by signing up for them via email.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Assume Everything You Say Is or Can Be Public
There are a variety of safety settings on many social media platforms. But just assume that it can all somehow, planned or unplanned, become made public. Assume what you post to your wall, to other people's walls, and even in "private messages" is as likely to remain private as it is to end up on the cover of Time. Just plan for that and post accordingly. That means you probably don't want to bash your work, your friends, your enemies, your in-laws or any other person or persons that you're at odds with unless you're prepared for potential exposure and confrontation.Think Before Posting
This is of course connected with the previous post but it's worth repeating. The average person that is one social media has between 100 and 200 connections on their network. That's a lot of individuals to keep in mind when you are posting. However, that means you should take a moment to think before posting. It's easy to take a shot at a particular group of people, business, political viewpoint, etc. We do it all the time, but it's worth taking a moment and asking yourself if there is a better way of presenting it or expressing your frustrations without targeting, generalizing, or misrepresenting a group of people.You May Know Your Friend, But You Don't Know Your Friend's Friends
This follows along the lines of the previous two but it's worth more directly thinking about. You have a sense of who you are connected with but not necessarily who your friends are connected with. When interacting with your friends via social media, remember that there is a chance their friends are likely to see the conversation (particularly if it occurs on your friend's wall instead of yours). Recognize that they have a variety of different views that are as likely to be similar as they are different. Be respectful as you engage with them as you don't fully know where they are coming from. Have dialogue but avoid getting nasty with them no matter what happens. Be civil and don't assume that whatever happens between the two of you will be considered "OK" by your mutual friend.Write Longer Posts in Outside of the Post Box
I can often get into debates with people online. I rather enjoy this in terms of the different ideas and thoughts that are presented. However, if I'm typing longer posts--ones that are more than 1-2 sentences, then I'm likely to move to a different platform than the textbox provided. This helps with a few things. It helps me see everything that I am writing, rather than having to scroll up and down the tiny box. It also helps me spell and grammar check--after all, if I'm trying to make an important point and my spelling and grammar are all over the place, my thoughts will be taken less seriously by some. Also, depending on the textbox's protocols, I don't want to hit "Enter" (which i'm trained to do automatically) to start a new paragraph and all of a sudden, find that it has been submitted. Last, but not least, is that by writing it in another environment gives me pause. There's one extra step I have to do before posting it and this is important. It helps me think about if I really want to post it. This has led me on a number of occasions to delete it instead and choose not to engage in the debate. Altogether, it allows me to better and more respectfully engage in discussion with people on my social networks.Strategically Correct/Critique
So this one is one of the trickiest in the lot. I'm going to recommend what is probably the most civil thing to do, but then I'm also going to talk about what I do and why. The most civil thing to when you find something that someone has posted is wrong, has mistakes in it, or is personally offensive for some reason is to contact that person privately and respectfully explain your concerns. You will need to recognize and accept that sharing your opinion won't necessarily change the post but you will have clearly acknowledged your concerns. The goal is to inform and explain your position if you find it offensive or to clarify how or why the post might be inaccurate if there is misinformation on it.However, that's where I deviate from my advice. My approach (and I have lost Facebook connections because of this mind you and am ok with that) is that I'm likely to speak up on a person's wall when I find something offensive or factually inaccurate. I do this because I'm personally a firm believer of dialogue. When I find something that is offensive or disagreeable, I move into the conversation, not by attacking the other person (usually) but by critically considering what has been posted and commenting as such. It's something I do regularly.
If You Have to Block, Then You Should Boot
This more firmly applies to connection-based (where both people agree to be connected) than follow-based social media (where agreement to follow is singularly made and not mutual). I'm a firm believer that if you have to block someone's posts, then you should not be connected to them on social media. My reasoning for this is that if you are connected to someone on a social network, you're making a public endorsement and that is a mutually beneficial statement. Each person says, "I publicly recognize this person as friend-worthy." In such instances, if you are choosing to block the person's posts while still being connected them, then you are still benefiting from the connection while silencing the person. That feels problematic to me and disingenuous. If you cannot tolerate what someone is saying or doing on their social media, then maybe, you shouldn't be connected to them. At this point, someone will usually say, "yeah but I see this person regularly and it would be awkward if I de-friended the person." Absolutely. But that means it's time to have adult conversations about your friendship or their questionable social media posts.What is some advice you would offer for better social media exchanges with friends, families, and colleagues?
Did you enjoy this read? Let me know your thoughts down below or feel free to browse around and check out some of my other posts!. You might also want to keep up to date with my blog by signing up for them via email.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Comments
Post a Comment